1. Australia
  2. Victoria
  3. Inner Eastern Melbourne
  4. Burwood-Ashburton

Burwood-Ashburton

A single suburb, as the publisher names it.

As published

Burwood-Ashburton in thirty seconds

suburb
Demand Not enough evidence
Main population driver Not enough evidence
Approved pipeline Not enough evidence
Housing delivery Moderate
Rental pressure Low
Evidence Not enough evidence

Completions over the same period were equivalent to 91% of commencements, for Victoria. These figures compare pipeline flows and do not track individual approved dwellings through construction.

Achieved rents moved +3.2% over the year, against +4.6% for the middle suburb in Victoria.

Each of these is a separate reading with its own rule and its own figures, set out under Housing Balance below. There is deliberately no single score: one number would hide which of them was doing the work.

At $650 a week, Burwood-Ashburton is higher than 77% of the 146 VIC suburbs we hold.

Rents there are up 3.2% over the past year, slower than the typical VIC suburb (up 4.5%).

Based on 906 new leases, which is a large enough sample to be steady quarter to quarter.

Rental market

Median weekly rent$650publisher’s figure · the twelve months to September 2025
One year+3.2%the twelve months to September 2025 against a year earlier
Five years+32.7%the twelve months to September 2025 against five years earlier
Since the twelve months to March 2000+217.1%103 quarters of history

103 quarters of history

Moving annual median, being the median across every lease signed in the preceding twelve months, which is smoother than a quarterly figure and lags one. Every point is a figure the publisher published; nothing between them is filled in.

$200$300$400$500$600$700$65020002006201220182024

What we hold for Burwood-Ashburton

Median weekly rent$650publisher’s figure · the twelve months to September 2025

The numbers behind the chart

Every quarter the publisher reported, as figures rather than a shape. Download as CSV — a stable link you can cite, check against the publisher’s own workbook, or put in a spreadsheet.

103 quarterly figures
QuarterMedian weekly rent Change on the quarter before
September quarter 2025$6500.0%
June quarter 2025$6500.0%
March quarter 2025$6500.0%
December quarter 2024$650+3.2%
September quarter 2024$630+5.0%
June quarter 2024$600+3.4%
March quarter 2024$580+3.6%
December quarter 2023$560+1.8%
September quarter 2023$5500.0%
June quarter 2023$550+5.8%
March quarter 2023$520+4.0%
December quarter 2022$500+1.0%
September quarter 2022$495+3.1%
June quarter 2022$480+1.1%
March quarter 2022$4750.0%
December quarter 2021$4750.0%
September quarter 2021$475+0.4%
June quarter 2021$473-1.5%
March quarter 2021$480-1.0%
December quarter 2020$485-1.0%
September quarter 2020$490-1.8%
June quarter 2020$499-0.2%
March quarter 2020$5000.0%
December quarter 2019$5000.0%
September quarter 2019$500+2.0%
June quarter 2019$4900.0%
March quarter 2019$490+1.0%
December quarter 2018$4850.0%
September quarter 2018$4850.0%
June quarter 2018$485+1.0%
March quarter 2018$4800.0%
December quarter 2017$480+2.6%
September quarter 2017$468+0.6%
June quarter 2017$465+1.1%
March quarter 2017$460+2.2%
December quarter 2016$450-2.2%
September quarter 2016$460+1.1%
June quarter 2016$455+1.1%
March quarter 2016$450+2.3%
December quarter 2015$4400.0%
September quarter 2015$4400.0%
June quarter 2015$440+1.1%
March quarter 2015$435+3.6%
December quarter 2014$420+1.2%
September quarter 2014$415+1.7%
June quarter 2014$408+1.2%
March quarter 2014$403-4.0%
December quarter 2013$420+2.4%
September quarter 2013$410+2.5%
June quarter 2013$4000.0%
March quarter 2013$400+1.3%
December quarter 2012$3950.0%
September quarter 2012$3950.0%
June quarter 2012$395+1.3%
March quarter 2012$390+2.6%
December quarter 2011$380+1.3%
September quarter 2011$375+1.4%
June quarter 2011$3700.0%
March quarter 2011$3700.0%
December quarter 2010$370+2.5%
September quarter 2010$361+0.3%
June quarter 2010$3600.0%
March quarter 2010$360+2.9%
December quarter 2009$3500.0%
September quarter 2009$3500.0%
June quarter 2009$3500.0%
March quarter 2009$3500.0%
December quarter 2008$350+2.9%
September quarter 2008$340+6.3%
June quarter 2008$3200.0%
March quarter 2008$320+8.5%
December quarter 2007$295+3.5%
September quarter 2007$285+1.8%
June quarter 2007$280+3.7%
March quarter 2007$2700.0%
December quarter 2006$270+1.9%
September quarter 2006$265+2.7%
June quarter 2006$258+3.2%
March quarter 2006$2500.0%
December quarter 2005$2500.0%
September quarter 2005$250-2.0%
June quarter 2005$2550.0%
March quarter 2005$255+2.0%
December quarter 2004$2500.0%
September quarter 2004$2500.0%
June quarter 2004$250+2.0%
March quarter 2004$245+2.1%
December quarter 2003$2400.0%
September quarter 2003$2400.0%
June quarter 2003$2400.0%
March quarter 2003$2400.0%
December quarter 2002$2400.0%
September quarter 2002$2400.0%
June quarter 2002$2400.0%
March quarter 2002$240+4.3%
December quarter 2001$230+2.2%
September quarter 2001$225+2.3%
June quarter 2001$220+4.8%
March quarter 2001$2100.0%
December quarter 2000$2100.0%
September quarter 2000$210+5.0%
June quarter 2000$200-2.4%
March quarter 2000$205

Victoria publishes no openly licensed sale prices at this level, so there is no yield here rather than one built on a value we would have to model.

Only New South Wales publishes rent quartiles, so the spread of rents within this market is not shown.

Where that sits

The suburbs either side of Burwood-Ashburton, ranked by the same figure in the same quarter.

Suburb Median rentOne year
Cheltenham$635+5.8%
Eltham-Research-Montmorency$640+6.7%
Northcote$640+4.1%
Burwood-Ashburton$650+3.2%
Camberwell-Glen Iris$6500.0%
Caulfield$650+2.4%
Collingwood-Abbotsford$650+4.0%

The Australian Bureau of Statistics publishes population and dwelling approvals by council area, not by suburb, and a suburb is not one of its statistical areas. Rather than report a neighbouring boundary’s figures as this market’s, neither is shown here.

Housing Balance

Where housing demand is coming from, how quickly supply is being delivered, and how rents are responding. Six readings, each with the figures behind it and the rule that turned those figures into a word. None of them says a market is short of housing: that needs household formation, which APRIQ does not hold, and is not estimated here.

No population or migration evidence can be mapped to Burwood-Ashburton. No measurement and no defensible mapping for a suburb. Broader evidence for Victoria is shown where it exists.

Demand

Not enough evidence

How fast the population is growing, against the national rate.

no population growth rate for this market

Main population driver

Not enough evidence

Which component moved the population most over the latest year the ABS splits it.

the ABS publishes no component split for this market

Approved pipeline

Not enough evidence

Whether dwelling approvals are running above or below the year before.

not enough approval history to compare two years

Housing delivery

Moderate

How much housing is being finished, against how much is being started.

Why?
Dwellings completed, Victoria12,220March quarter 2026
Dwellings started, Victoria13,437March quarter 2026
Completions as a share of commencements91%March quarter 2026

Strong at or above 95% of commencements, weak below 80%, moderate in between, over the same twelve months. Completions during the period compared with commencements during the period — these figures compare pipeline flows and do not track individual approved dwellings through construction.

Rental pressure

Low

How fast achieved rents are rising, against the rest of the state.

Why?
Rent change over a year, Burwood-Ashburton+3.2%the twelve months to September 2025
Rent change over a year, the middle suburb in Victoria+4.6%the twelve months to September 2025

High when rents rose at least one percentage point faster than the state, low when at least a point slower, moderate in between. Compared against the state rather than the nation because each bond authority defines its own series: changes compare, levels do not.

Evidence

Not enough evidence

How much of this market's picture was measured for this market.

no demand evidence can be mapped to this market

Market signals

Four separate readings, each with the figures behind it and the rule that turned those figures into words. There is deliberately no single score: one number would hide which of these was doing the work, and a market with strong rental evidence and no population figure would score as though it had both. Every signal describes what has been measured — none of them is advice, and none says what will happen next.

Rental momentum

Rising more slowly than the middle of Victoria

How rents here moved over a year, against the typical suburb in Victoria.

Why?
Rent change over a year here+3.2%the twelve months to September 2025 against a year earlier
The middle suburb in Victoria+4.6%the twelve months to September 2025 against a year earlier
Difference−1.4 percentage pointsthe twelve months to September 2025 against a year earlier
Markets in the comparison146the twelve months to September 2025 against a year earlier

The difference between this market’s one-year rent change and the middle change across every suburb the same publisher reports, in percentage points: 3 or more above is well above, 1 above is above, within 1 either way is in line. Changes are compared within one state because each bond authority defines its own series — movement may be compared between them, the rent itself may not.

Population pressure

Not enough evidence

How fast the population here is changing, against how fast Australia is changing.

No population estimate is published for this market at a geography the ABS uses.

Approved housing pipeline

Not enough evidence

How many dwellings this market approved over twelve months for every thousand residents, against the national rate. Approvals are permission to build, not completed dwellings.

Dwelling approvals are published by council area, and this market is not one.

Evidence quality

Thin

How much weight the figures on this page can carry.

Why?
New leases behind the current figure906the twelve months to September 2025
Quarters of history103to the twelve months to September 2025
How current3 quarters behind the newest any state has publishedthe twelve months to September 2025
OriginAs the publisher published itthe twelve months to September 2025
KnowabilityDated by the end of its reference period, because no release date is recordedthe twelve months to September 2025

Strong needs 200 or more new leases behind the current figure, the most recent quarter published anywhere, and eight or more quarters of history. Adequate needs 50 leases and no more than one quarter behind. A withheld count cannot earn better than thin, because a suppressed number is unknown rather than small.

Where these numbers come from

The latest figures here cover the twelve months to September quarter 2025, which ended 30 September 2025. December quarter 2025 has since closed and no figures for it have appeared here. Either the publisher has not released it or we have not yet retrieved it; we do not guess which, and nothing here is filled in meanwhile.

The rent figures here are published by Department of Families, Fairness and Housing and used under an open licence. Any other figure on this page names its own publisher on the line it appears on. Every rent figure is either as published or arithmetic on figures as published. APRIQ models and estimates nothing: where a figure is a publisher’s own estimate — an estimated resident population is one — it is called an estimate where it is shown. Growth is measured between named quarters, never by counting back rows, because an area is published only when it clears the publisher’s reporting threshold. This page exists because Burwood-Ashburton has 906 bonds behind its current figure and 103 quarters of history; markets with less than that get no page rather than a thin one. Method, sources and licences.